Volume 14, Issue 3 (5-2025)                   2025, 14(3): 37-53 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Varasteh Moradi H, Boroughani M, Nadim A. Responses of Birds and Insects Communities to Natural and Artificial Forest Gaps (Case Study: Shastkalateh Forest, Gorgan, Iran). Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology 2025; 14 (3) :37-53
URL: http://ijae.iut.ac.ir/article-1-1295-en.html
Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Fisheries and Environmental Sciences. Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resoureces, Gorgan, Iran.
Abstract:   (13 Views)
Forest gaps represent significant ecological disturbances that can affect vegetation structure, insect populations, and avian communities. This study aimed to evaluate the density and diversity of bird species across three treatment types: closed canopy (control), natural gaps, and artificial gaps, within the protected Shast-Kalateh forest. Bird and insect sampling was conducted at 70 points, each with a 25-meter radius, utilizing point count and distance sampling methodologies. Redundancy analysis indicated that the strongest positive correlations between bird populations and habitat variables, as well as insect abundance, were found in natural gaps and closed canopy areas. Natural gaps exhibited the highest avian abundance, likely attributed to increased light availability, enhanced structural complexity, and greater ecological dynamism. Conversely, artificial gaps, which displayed reduced structural complexity and unstable food resources, negatively impacted breeding bird populations. Distance sampling revealed that the European Robin (Erithacus rubecula) had the highest density across all treatments. ANOSIM analysis demonstrated significant differences in bird species composition among the treatments (p = 0.001). Overall, natural gaps fostered higher bird density, greater avian diversity, and increased insect diversity compared to both closed canopy areas and artificial gaps.
Full-Text [PDF 765 kb]   (7 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Applied Ecology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb

تحت نظارت وف ایرانی